Adobe has agreed to a $150 million settlement with the Justice Department to resolve allegations that the company concealed subscription termination fees and made it difficult for consumers to cancel their plans.
Adobe, based in San Jose, California, is one of the world’s largest software companies and the developer of programs such as Photoshop, Acrobat, and Premiere Pro used across the design, media, and business industries. Much of its software is now delivered through subscription services on its Creative Cloud platform.
The lawsuit centers on Adobe’s “annual paid monthly” plan, a subscription option offered through its Creative Cloud services. Regulators claim that many subscribers did not realize that canceling before the end of the first year could trigger a substantial termination charge. According to court filings, Adobe calculated that fee as roughly half of the remaining payments owed under the contract.
Regulators claim that consumers attempting to cancel their subscriptions encountered significant obstacles. Court filings state that people trying to cancel online had to move through multiple confirmation screens and prompts before completing the request. Those who attempted to cancel by phone were allegedly transferred between representatives and experienced delays before the cancellation could be finalized.
Adobe said it has made changes in recent years to streamline its subscription enrollment and cancellation processes and improve transparency.
Regulators argue that the practices violated the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, a consumer protection lawConsumer protection law is the body of federal and state laws designed to protect people from unfair, deceptive, fraudulent, or abusive practices in the marketplace. These laws regulate areas such as advertising, sales, lending, debt collection, credit reporting, warranties, financial services, and consumer products.Read more → enacted by Congress in 2010. The statute governs online subscription programs and automatic renewal services, which have become a central part of many digital business models.
ROSCA requires companies offering online subscriptions to clearly disclose the key terms of an offer before collecting a consumer’s billing information. The law also requires businesses to obtain a customer’s consent to those terms and provide a simple way for subscribers to cancel recurring charges.
The lawsuit was filed in June 2024 by the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint claims Adobe buried key subscription terms in fine print or placed them behind hyperlinks and text boxes that many users might not notice during the enrollment process.
The lawsuit also names two Adobe executives, David Wadhwani, president of the company’s digital media business, and Maninder Sawhney, a senior vice president in digital sales.
Under the settlement, Adobe would be required to clearly disclose any Early Termination Fee before enrolling consumers in a subscription and explain how the fee is calculated. The agreement would also require the company to notify users before a free trial lasting longer than seven days converts into a paid plan that includes such a fee. In addition, Adobe would have to provide subscribers with straightforward ways to cancel their subscriptions.
Adobe said in a statement that it disagrees with the government’s claims but chose to resolve the matter.
Share This Article
If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.
Law Commentary’s Staff Writers are dedicated legal professionals and journalists who excel at making complex legal topics accessible and relatable. They are committed to providing clear, accurate commentary that helps readers understand the impact of legal news on their daily lives.
New York City’s new “Click-to-Cancel” rule took effect October 1, 2026, requiring businesses to make subscriptions as easy to end as they are to start and giving city regulators new authority to act when companies block or delay cancellation.The rule covers automatic renewals and continuous service subscriptions and requires businesses...
Read
More »
A payment processing company has agreed to pay $12 million and accept sweeping restrictions on its business after the Federal Trade Commission accused it of helping more than 1,000 sham merchants process unauthorized charges on consumers’ credit and debit cards.The FTC sued 5967 Ventures LLC, which does business as Humboldt...
Read
More »
Meta Platforms has agreed to impose daily time limits and overnight restrictions on Instagram and Facebook users under 18 as part of a proposed multistate settlement worth up to $17.1 billion. The agreement would resolve claims that the company used harmful design features, misled families about youth safety and violated...
Read
More »
Amazon was sued Monday by the Federal Trade Commission and 22 states over allegations that it secretly changed how its advertising auctions set prices and overcharged about 1.2 million U.S. advertisers by more than $20 billion.Filed August 31 in federal court in Washington state, the lawsuit claims Amazon altered the...
Read
More »
Federal and state regulators have sued Hims & Hers Health, alleging the telehealth company charged hundreds of thousands of consumers for prescription subscriptions without their informed consent and shared sensitive health information with advertising platforms despite promises that its service was private and discreet.The Federal Trade Commission, California, and the...
Read
More »
We use cookies and similar technologies to help our website function, understand how visitors use our site, and improve your experience. Some cookies are necessary for the website to operate, while others may be used for analytics or advertising.