Skip to main content
Editions

Diddy Ordered to Pay NBCUniversal $478K After Losing $100M Defamation Lawsuit

by Camila Curcio | Oct 07, 2026
Sean “Diddy” Combs appears on a laptop screen, with a smaller inset image of him wearing sunglasses. Photo Source: bella1105 / Shutterstock.com

Sean “Diddy” Combs has been ordered to pay NBCUniversal and other defendants $477,700.50 in legal fees after losing his $100 million defamation lawsuit over the Peacock documentary Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy.

New York Supreme Court Justice Phaedra F. Perry-Bond issued the fee award on October 6, 2026, nearly six months after dismissing Combs’ lawsuit under New York’s anti-SLAPP law. NBCUniversal, Peacock and production company Ample had sought $990,292 for the cost of defending the case.

Perry-Bond ultimately awarded less than half that amount, finding that some of the hours billed by NBCUniversal’s lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher were excessive even as she approved their hourly rates.

The six-lawyer team charged rates ranging from $915 for a junior associate to $1,980 for a senior partner. Perry-Bond acknowledged that those figures were higher than customary rates but declined to reduce them, citing the publicity and complexity of the case, the $100 million in damages at stake, the attorneys’ experience and the quality of their work.

She instead cut more than $512,000 from the hours billed, including about $269,000 for work drafting a motion and $78,000 for internal discussions among the attorneys.

Combs’ representative, Juda Engelmayer, emphasized the reduction, saying NBCUniversal had sought nearly $1 million and that the court found substantial portions of its billing excessive and unreasonable.

The fee award stems from Perry-Bond’s April 20 dismissal of the lawsuit under New York’s anti-SLAPP protections. The law provides an expedited way to challenge lawsuits targeting speech or other activity involving matters of public concern and allows successful defendants to recover attorneys’ fees.

Because NBCUniversal and the other defendants prevailed on their anti-SLAPP motion, Perry-Bond directed them to seek reimbursement for the cost of defending the case.

Combs sued NBCUniversal, Peacock and Ample in February 2025, alleging the documentary falsely portrayed him as responsible for multiple deaths and other serious crimes. He sought at least $100 million in damages.

Among the statements he challenged were allegations concerning the deaths of his former partner Kim Porter and rapper Christopher Wallace, better known as The Notorious B.I.G., as well as claims involving the late music executives Andre Harrell and Heavy D. Combs also objected to allegations involving underage girls and purported secretly recorded sex tapes.

In dismissing the case, Perry-Bond found that Combs had failed to establish a substantial basis for his defamation claims under the heightened standard that applies to cases covered by New York’s anti-SLAPP law.

The judge found that the documentary, viewed as a whole, did not show that NBCUniversal acted with gross irresponsibility in publishing the disputed allegations. She pointed in part to the program’s presentation of the claims as theories advanced by interviewees rather than established facts and its inclusion of Combs’ denials.

Musician Al B. Sure!, who had a longtime relationship with Porter, was among those interviewed in the documentary. Perry-Bond noted that viewers were given information allowing them to assess the perspectives and potential biases of people making allegations about Combs.

The April ruling did not determine whether the allegations discussed in the documentary were true. It instead found that Combs had not met the legal standard required to continue his defamation case against the companies that produced and distributed it.

Combs later challenged the size of NBCUniversal’s fee request, arguing that any award should be limited to approximately $166,769. He also asked Perry-Bond to delay deciding the issue while he pursued an appeal of the dismissal.

The judge rejected the request to postpone the fee decision but substantially reduced the amount NBCUniversal sought.

The civil ruling comes as Combs serves a 50-month federal prison sentence following his conviction on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. A jury acquitted him of racketeering conspiracy and sex-trafficking charges. He is separately appealing his criminal conviction and sentence.

The $477,700.50 order leaves the dismissal of his NBCUniversal defamation case intact while requiring him to cover nearly half a million dollars of the defendants’ legal costs.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Camila Curcio
Camila studied Entertainment Journalism at UCLA and is the founder of a clothing brand inspired by music festivals and youth culture. Her YouTube channel, Cami's Playlist, focuses on concerts and music history. With experience in branding, marketing, and content creation, her work has taken her to festivals around the world, shaping her unique voice in digital media and fashion.

Related Articles

Sean “Diddy” Combs in a white tuxedo jacket and bow tie on a red carpet surrounded by photographers.
Diddy, NewsNation Owner Weigh Settlement Talks in $100M Defamation Case

Sean “Diddy” Combs and NewsNation owner Nexstar Media are weighing settlement talks in his $100 million defamation lawsuit after a federal judge kept alive a claim over an on-air allegation involving drug-laced baby oil.A Sept. 10 court filing shows the parties are considering either mediation or a settlement conference before... Read More »

Man wearing sunglasses and a large diamond chain speaks into a microphone at an outdoor podium, with a brick building in the background.
Sean Combs Appeals Sentence as Court Weighs Early Release Bid

Attorneys for Sean Combs appeared before a federal appeals court this week, pressing for a faster ruling on whether the music executive was improperly sentenced following his 2025 criminal conviction. The hearing marks a critical stage in Combs’ effort to reduce his prison time or potentially secure early release after... Read More »

Search articles and Legalpedia

Subscribe to Newsletter