Georgia Law Faces Scrutiny After Pregnant, Brain-Dead Woman Kept Alive for Fetus

by Alexandra Agraz | May 21, 2025
Sign outside Emory University Hospital, where a complex legal and ethical case regarding a pregnant, brain-dead woman is unfolding. Photo Source: Emory Hospital via bizjournals.com

The complex case of Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse from Georgia who was declared brain dead at approximately nine weeks pregnant, has ignited fierce debate over the state's restrictive abortion laws, raising significant legal and ethical questions. Smith has remained on life support for over 90 days, with doctors at Emory University Hospital keeping her organs functioning to support her now 22-week-old fetus.

Smith suffered a medical emergency in February, leading to her brain death. However, doctors cited Georgia’s LIFE Act, a 2019 law that bans most abortions once fetal cardiac activity is detected, typically around six weeks, as the reason for maintaining Smith on life support. Her mother, April Newkirk, has publicly voiced her distress and confusion, emphasizing, "My grandson may be blind, may not be able to walk, we don't know if he'll live once she has him... we should have had a choice."

This scenario has drawn pointed criticism from Democratic State Senator Nabilah Islam Parkes, who wrote to Georgia's Attorney General, Chris Carr, demanding clarity and condemning the hospital's interpretation of the law as "medically unsound" and "inhumane." In response, Carr's office argued that the LIFE Act does not mandate life support for brain-dead women, asserting that "removing life support is not an action 'with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy.'"

Despite Carr’s interpretation, Emory Healthcare has defended its cautious approach. The hospital cited clinical expertise, medical literature, and legal guidance as reasons for its adherence to the LIFE Act and "all other applicable laws," underscoring its priority of patient safety.

This scenario exemplifies confusion prevalent in many states after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Professor Mary Ziegler of UC Davis explained that hospitals, wary of criminal repercussions in states with strict abortion bans, often adopt conservative interpretations even when officials suggest otherwise. She also highlighted previous cases in Georgia, such as Amber Thurman and Candi Miller, whose deaths were reportedly linked to delays in abortion care caused by the state's abortion laws, underscoring Georgia's maternal mortality crisis, particularly affecting Black women.

Central to the legal uncertainty is the concept of "fetal personhood," enshrined in Georgia’s abortion law, conferring legal rights upon embryos and fetuses. State Senator Ed Setzler, who sponsored the 2019 abortion legislation, supported Emory's cautious stance, arguing the hospital's actions underscore "the value of innocent human life."

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz is a former Diplomatic Aide with firsthand experience in facilitating high-level international events, including the signing of critical economic and political agreements between the United States and Mexico. She holds dual associate degrees in Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, and Film, blending a diverse academic background in diplomacy, culture, and storytelling. This unique combination enables her to provide nuanced perspectives on global relations and cultural narratives.

Related Articles

A group of people gathers inside a building, holding signs related to abortion rights, with some signs stating "Roe is unconstitutional" and "We will adopt your baby."
Texas Governor signs "heartbeat" abortion bill

Texas joined South Carolina and Idaho last week in banning nearly all abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected. The law is set to be enforced in September; it now requires a physician to check for a fetal heartbeat and makes any individual who knowingly assists with an unlawful procedure... Read More »