Grocery Outlet Hit With Class Action Over Deceptive Sales Strategy

by Alexandra Agraz | Jun 25, 2025
Exterior view of a Grocery Outlet store with signage indicating it as a "bargain market." Photo Source: Catherine Douglas Moran/Grocery Dive

A class action lawsuit filed on June 2 in Multnomah County Circuit Court accuses Grocery Outlet and dozens of its affiliated store operators in Oregon of deceptive pricing practices that violate state consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs allege that the retailer used fabricated "elsewhere" prices to create the illusion of savings, misleading customers into thinking they were getting better deals than were available.

The lawsuit, brought by Oregon residents Schearon Stewart, John Franz, and Roger Sullivan, claims that Grocery Outlet promoted products using reference prices that were either inflated, unverifiable, or entirely fictitious. These prices were presented as what the same product would cost "elsewhere," but without identifying the competing retailer or confirming that the item was even sold in the same geographic area. In several examples cited in the complaint, the supposed "elsewhere" price was significantly higher than prices at nearby stores.

Cartons of eggs displaying price comparison tag Photo Source: Reddit user u/Ok-Contribution7317, r/GroceryOutlet One example involves a $3.19 carton of oat milk advertised as discounted from an "elsewhere" price of $4.99. The same product was found at a Fred Meyer store for $1.99. In another instance, a frozen pizza labeled with an "elsewhere" price of $8.99 was selling at Fred Meyer for just $3.99, despite being advertised as a bargain.

Oregon law prohibits the use of reference pricing unless the seller identifies the competitor and confirms that the comparison is accurate and geographically relevant. The state also restricts the use of discount language like "percent off" unless it reflects a reduction from the seller’s prior price. According to the complaint, Grocery Outlet routinely violated these rules through signage, shelf tags, and weekly advertisements that claimed savings based on false or misleading comparisons.

The suit names Grocery Outlet Inc., based in California, along with 66 individual owner-operators across the state of Oregon. The plaintiffs are seeking equitable relief to stop the pricing strategy, restitution for consumers, and recovery of attorney fees. They plan to amend the complaint to include claims for monetary damages once the required notice period expires.

The case, Stewart, Franz, and Sullivan v. Grocery Outlet et al., highlights ongoing scrutiny of pricing practices in the retail industry. Similar lawsuits have been filed in recent years against major grocery chains, including Albertsons, Publix, and Walmart.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz is a former Diplomatic Aide with firsthand experience in facilitating high-level international events, including the signing of critical economic and political agreements between the United States and Mexico. She holds dual associate degrees in Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, and Film, blending a diverse academic background in diplomacy, culture, and storytelling. This unique combination enables her to provide nuanced perspectives on global relations and cultural narratives.

Related Articles

Exterior of a Costco Wholesale store displaying its signage.
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Costco Over Chocolate Dipped Ice Cream

A lawsuit which was brought against warehouse retail giant, Costco, has been dismissed by a federal judge in California. The lawsuit was brought forward by Plaintiff Ankush Puri. Puri alleged that Costco falsely advertised their Kirkland brand chocolate almond-dipped vanilla ice cream bars because the chocolate used in the ice... Read More »