New York Agrees to Pay $250K to End Lawsuit With Christian-Based Adoption Agency

adoption agency Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

New York State officials have agreed to pay $250,000 to settle a discrimination-based lawsuit against a non-profit adoption and pregnancy resource center.

In 2018, New York State’s Office of Children and Family Services targeted the Christian non-profit group, New Hope Services Facility, and threatened to close operations if they did not reverse their policy of placing children only in homes where there was a married man and woman. The state argued that the non-profit facility’s religious policy was discriminatory against LGBT couples.

New Hope facility is both an adoption agency and a pregnancy resource center providing counseling and support for individuals who are looking for options. The facility operates without government funding and is instead funded through its ministry, individual donors, and private grants.

The non-profit was represented by lawyers from the advocacy group, Alliance Defending Freedom. Senior Counsel Roger Brooks with the ADF argued that “New Hope is a private religious ministry that doesn’t take a dime from the government. Shutting down an adoption provider for its religious beliefs—needlessly and unconstitutionally reducing the number of agencies willing to help—benefits no one—certainly not children.” Brooks added, “New Hope’s faith-guided services don’t coerce anyone and do nothing to interfere with other adoption providers who have different beliefs about family and the best interests of children. The decision from the court simply allows New Hope to continue serving the community so that more kids find permanent homes, more adoptive parents welcome a new child, and more birth parents enjoy the exceptional support that New Hope has offered for decades.”

Brooks went on to argue that the state’s allegations were nothing more than violations of the nonprofit’s First Amendment rights.

In September 2022, a federal court granted New Hope’s request for a preliminary injunction to allow them to continue working with infants with disabilities and other factors that made them “hard to place” in permanent homes.

In granting that request for a preliminary injunction, the federal district court permanently prevented the state from going after the nonprofit and enforcing state law “insofar as it would compel New Hope to process applications from, or place children for adoption with, same-sex couples or unmarried cohabitating couples, and insofar as it would prevent New Hope from referring such couples to other agencies.”

The order from the federal district court came after a temporary order was issued in October 2020 after the US Court of Appeals for the second circuit ruled in favor of the non-profit organization. The case was sent back to the district court for further processing.

Following news of the settlement win, New Hope Family Services Executive Director Kathy Jerman shared, “Every child deserves a home with a loving mother and father who are committed to each other.” Jerman adds, “New Hope walks with adoptive families and birth parents alike to place children with adoptive families. It’s regrettable that New York ever threatened to shut down our adoption services, through which we have placed more than 1,000 children with adoptive families since we began in 1965. We live in a diverse state, and we need more adoption providers, not fewer. We’re grateful this case has reached a favorable end that allows us to keep serving children and families.”

Nadia El-Yaouti
Nadia El-Yaouti
Nadia El-Yaouti is a postgraduate from James Madison University, where she studied English and Education. Residing in Central Virginia with her husband and two young daughters, she balances her workaholic tendencies with a passion for travel, exploring the world with her family.
Legal Blogs (Sponsored)
News Image

San Francisco employment law attorney Richard Koss explains the significance of the Supreme Court’s Title VII ruling in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri. read more

by Bay Area Employment Lawyers | Employment Law for Employees
News Image

Los Angeles insurance law attorneys Gianelli & Morris discuss the impact of the landmark California Supreme Court case Crisci v. Security Insurance Company. read more

by Gianelli & Morris | Insurance Denials & Bad Faith
News Image

California healthcare criminal defense attorney Art Kalantar defends healthcare providers against allegations of kickbacks & Stark Law self-referral violations. read more

by Law Offices of Art Kalantar | Health Care Law