Skip to main content
Editions

National Legal News, Information & Blogs

Pediatricians and Physicians File Lawsuit Against RFK Jr. for Removing COVID Vaccines from CDC Schedule

by Lawrence J. Tjan | Jul 09, 2025
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaking during a congressional hearing. Photo Source: Shawn Thew/EPA/Shutterstock via ABC News

In a legal battle over vaccine policy, major medical organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American College of Physicians (ACP), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), have filed a lawsuit against Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the current Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), alleging that his recent directive removing COVID-19 vaccines from recommended schedules for children and pregnant women is arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful.

The lawsuit, filed on July 7, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, challenges a Secretarial Directive signed by Kennedy on May 19, 2025. The directive removed COVID-19 vaccinations for healthy children aged six months to 17 years and pregnant women from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended immunization schedules.

Kennedy, who previously promised during his Senate confirmation that he would not discourage vaccine use, defended his controversial decision via social media on May 27, asserting it was aimed at restoring public trust. However, this move was immediately criticized by public health experts and the medical community, who argued it would significantly increase the risk of illness and death among vulnerable populations.

In their complaint, the medical groups accuse Kennedy of undermining well-established, scientifically rigorous public health processes by bypassing the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The ACIP has been integral to setting vaccine policy and recommendations in the United States for over 60 years, and its guidelines are closely tied to federal and state health regulations, insurance coverage mandates, and immunization programs.

Plaintiffs argue Kennedy’s actions directly contradict his own sworn testimony before Congress, where he claimed his personal opinions about vaccines were irrelevant. They further assert the directive contravenes a substantial body of scientific evidence affirming the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for both children and pregnant individuals.

According to the plaintiffs, the directive has already created significant confusion and distrust among healthcare providers and their patients. Physicians nationwide report heightened vaccine hesitancy, disrupted patient relationships, increased logistical barriers, and difficulties in accessing vaccines through established programs such as Vaccines for Children (VFC).

Prominent public health leaders voiced their opposition. Dr. Susan Kressly, President of the AAP, said Kennedy's directive "undermines the trust pediatricians have built over decades" and poses a direct threat to children's health. Similarly, Dr. Georges Benjamin, Executive Director of the American Public Health Association (APHA), described Kennedy’s actions as "reckless" and said they compromise the standard of care provided by physicians across the country.

Additionally, medical providers and clinics expressed concerns that the directive could lead to increased transmission rates of COVID-19, more severe illness cases, hospitalizations, and preventable deaths, particularly among pregnant women and newborns who benefit from maternal vaccination.

The lawsuit seeks immediate judicial relief, requesting the court declare Kennedy’s directive unlawful and require the restoration of COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and healthy children on the CDC immunization schedules. Plaintiffs also seek to permanently block enforcement of the May 19 directive and demand that HHS publicly retract its prior statements supporting the change.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Lawrence J. Tjan
Lawrence is an attorney and CEO of Law Commentary. His legal background includes corporate and general business law, litigation, transactional matters, and law practice management. His litigation experience has included complex matters involving antitrust, insurance bad faith, and medical malpractice. On the transactional side, Lawrence has worked with buy-sell agreements, Regulation D disclosures, stock option plans, and business matters. Lawrence draws on his legal and business experience to help make court decisions, litigation, legislation, public policy, and other legal developments more accessible to the general public and to give readers clear context for understanding the law and how it affects businesses, consumers, and communities.

Related Articles

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stands in a formal room adjusting his suit jacket as people gather around him.
ACLU Sues RFK Jr., NIH Over Alleged Censorship of Medical Research Grants

Seventeen biomedical researchers represented by the American Civil Liberties Union sued Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya and other federal defendants Wednesday, alleging the government is censoring federally funded science by targeting research involving subjects and viewpoints the Trump administration disfavors.The proposed class action, filed in... Read More »

Tylenol Extra Strength bottle and red cap filled with white acetaminophen tablets.
Tylenol Maker Fights Ruling That Revived 500 Autism Lawsuits

Tylenol maker Kenvue and several major retailers are asking a federal appeals court to reconsider a decision that revived more than 500 lawsuits alleging that acetaminophen use during pregnancy contributed to autism or ADHD in children.In a filing Thursday, Kenvue and defendants including Walmart, CVS, Walgreens and Target urged the... Read More »

Search articles and Legalpedia

Subscribe to Newsletter