The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) targeted a star-studded NFT project, "Stoner Cats," featuring the voices of Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis, Chris Rock, Jane Fonda, Seth MacFarlane, and other Hollywood celebrities. On Wednesday, September 13, the federal agency charged the creators of the animated series for conducting an unregistered offering of NFTs. Stoner Cats 2 LLC, the company behind the project, has agreed to a $1 million civil penalty and will establish a fund to reimburse NFT buyers.
This case marks a significant step in the SEC's ongoing efforts to regulate the burgeoning NFT market. While NFTs have often been viewed as collectibles rather than securities, the SEC's action suggests that the regulatory landscape could be shifting. Projects that promise future profits and are heavily promoted could come under scrutiny, even if they involve non-traditional assets like NFTs.
Regardless of whether your offering involves beavers, chinchillas or animal-based NFTs, under the federal securities laws, it’s the economic reality of the offering — not the labels you put on it or the underlying objects — that guides the determination of what’s an investment contract and therefore a security…
— Gurbir S. Grewal, SEC Director of Enforcement
According to the Hollywood Reporter, Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, in a statement, said, “Regardless of whether your offering involves beavers, chinchillas or animal-based NFTs, under the federal securities laws, it’s the economic reality of the offering — not the labels you put on it or the underlying objects — that guides the determination of what’s an investment contract and therefore a security… Here, the SEC’s order finds that Stoner Cats marketed its knowledge of crypto projects, touted that the price of their NFTs could increase and took other steps that led investors to believe they would profit from selling the NFTs in the secondary market. It’s therefore hardly surprising, as the order finds, that Stoner Cats sold its entire supply of NFTs in just 35 minutes, generating proceeds of over $8 million, most of which were then resold — not held as collectibles — in the secondary market within months.”
By marketing statements touting that the price of the NFT could increase in value to those who purchased the NFTs, the SEC has classified these NFTs as investment contracts, thereby categorizing them as securities. As such, they are required to be registered prior to public offering. The SEC employs the "Howey test" to determine if an asset qualifies as an investment contract. This test stipulates that an investment of money must be made in a collective venture, where the investor anticipates a return on investment, and that return is solely reliant on the endeavors of third parties.
The SEC's move could serve as a cautionary tale for celebrities considering NFT ventures. The involvement of high-profile individuals like Kutcher and Kunis in promoting the project likely drew the SEC's attention. Celebrities may now think twice before lending their name and reputation to such projects, fearing regulatory repercussions.
The SEC's action also highlights the need for more transparent guidelines to protect consumers in the NFT space. The Stoner Cats project raised over $8 million by selling NFTs that granted access to the animated series and other perks. However, the SEC found that the funds were used to pay the cast and production team, raising questions about the true nature of the offering.
The SEC's action against the "Stoner Cats" NFT project serves as a wake-up call for both the crypto industry and celebrities. It underscores the importance of regulatory compliance and consumer protection, even in new and evolving markets like NFTs. As the SEC's Director of Enforcement, Gurbir S. Grewal, stated, the economic reality of an offering determines its classification under federal securities laws, regardless of how it is labeled.
Share This Article
If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.
Lawrence is an attorney and CEO of Law Commentary. His legal background includes corporate and general business law, litigation, transactional matters, and law practice management. His litigation experience has included complex matters involving antitrust, insurance bad faith, and medical malpractice. On the transactional side, Lawrence has worked with buy-sell agreements, Regulation D disclosures, stock option plans, and business matters. Lawrence draws on his legal and business experience to help make court decisions, litigation, legislation, public policy, and other legal developments more accessible to the general public and to give readers clear context for understanding the law and how it affects businesses, consumers, and communities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission opened a new route Thursday for tokenized stock trading, just two days after the Senate blocked the CLARITY Act and stalled Congress’s sweeping effort to rewrite federal rules for cryptocurrency markets.The SEC’s five-year “Innovation Exemption” allows qualifying platforms to facilitate trading in tokenized versions of...
Read
More »
Netflix is facing the threat of a defamation lawsuit from prediction market platform Kalshi, which claims a trailer for an upcoming documentary about betting markets falsely implies the company violated a court order barring it from offering sports wagering contracts in Nevada.Kalshi's attorneys sent Netflix a cease-and-desist letter demanding the...
Read
More »
A federal judge in Philadelphia has approved a $1.1 million settlement in a securities fraud case brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against beverage startup The3rdBevco Inc. and its founder, Peter Scalise III, over a scheme involving false claims of a celebrity-backed product and the misuse of...
Read
More »
John McAfee, the founder of the popular antivirus software that bears his name, has been indicted on charges of fraud and money laundering of cryptocurrency securities.
The revolutionary pioneer of internet security is in hot water after he and his bodyguard and “cryptocurrency team” advisor Jimmy Gale Watson Jr., were...
Read
More »
A new class-action lawsuit was filed Monday in Jackson County Circuit Court against Grammy-winning artist Drake, social-media star Adin Ross, and the online casino platform Stake.us, alleging that these parties collaborated in the design and promotion of a “deceptive” gambling scheme marketed to Missouri consumers.
According to a 34-page complaint,...
Read
More »
We use cookies and similar technologies to help our website function, understand how visitors use our site, and improve your experience. Some cookies are necessary for the website to operate, while others may be used for analytics or advertising.