Skip to main content

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review California's Flavored Tobacco Ban

by Lawrence J. Tjan | Jan 08, 2024
A young woman explores vaping products in a retail shop, highlighting consumer interest in flavored tobacco items.
Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

In a significant development for public health and tobacco regulation, the U.S. Supreme Court, on Monday, January 7, 2024, decided not to review a challenge against California's ban on flavored tobacco products. This decision effectively upholds the voter-approved measure, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle over tobacco product regulation in the United States.

The challenge was brought forth by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, against California's law prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products. This law, signed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom in 2020, was a response to rising concerns about increasing e-cigarette and tobacco usage among teenagers. The ban includes a wide range of products, from menthol cigarettes to cotton candy-flavored vaping items.

After the law's enactment, its implementation faced delays due to a referendum initiated by a tobacco industry coalition. However, in November 2022, Proposition 31, which upheld the ban, received overwhelming support from California voters. Following this, R.J. Reynolds and other plaintiffs filed a lawsuit contending that the federal Tobacco Control Act, enforced by the FDA, preempts state and local regulations banning flavored tobacco product sales.

A federal judge, however, dismissed these arguments, a stance later upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. This decision was based on a precedent set by a similar ruling regarding a flavored tobacco ban in Los Angeles County.

The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the appeal signifies a substantial endorsement of states' rights to impose stricter tobacco regulations than those at the federal level. California Attorney General Rob Bonta hailed the decision as "excellent news," emphasizing the state's commitment to combating addiction and safeguarding public health.

California's law positions it as the second state, following Massachusetts in 2019, to implement a comprehensive ban on all flavored tobacco product sales. This move is part of a broader trend, with several states and municipalities introducing restrictions on flavored vaping products.

At the federal level, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has regulated e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco actively. In 2020, the FDA banned all flavors except tobacco and menthol in cartridge-based e-cigarettes like Juul. Furthermore, the FDA proposed banning menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars in April 2022, though these rules are still pending finalization.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Lawrence J. Tjan
Lawrence is an attorney and CEO of Law Commentary. His legal background includes corporate and general business law, litigation, transactional matters, and law practice management. His litigation experience has included complex matters involving antitrust, insurance bad faith, and medical malpractice. On the transactional side, Lawrence has worked with buy-sell agreements, Regulation D disclosures, stock option plans, and business matters. Lawrence draws on his legal and business experience to help make court decisions, litigation, legislation, public policy, and other legal developments more accessible to the general public and to give readers clear context for understanding the law and how it affects businesses, consumers, and communities.

Related Articles

A person holding a yellow e-cigarette device.

Supreme Court Overturns Lower Court’s Ruling That FDA Can’t Block Vape Makers From Selling Flavored Products

The FDA enjoyed a win last week when the Supreme Court agreed with the agency’s refusal to approve the use of sweet-flavored e-cigarettes. The High Court unanimously struck down a lower court’s ruling that the FDA was wrong to block vape manufacturers, Triton Distribution and Vapetasia, from selling their flavored... Read More about Supreme Court Overturns Lower Court’s Ruling That FDA Can’t Block Vape Makers From Selling Flavored Products

A young person holding a smartphone, likely engaging with online content.

California Law to Protect Minors’ Online Privacy and Purchasing Is Partially Affirmed

In response to concerns that many social media purveyors are exploiting the online experiences of minors for their own profit, California’s legislature amended its Parent’s Accountability and Child Protection Act in 2022 to require online businesses to better protect children. The new law titled “The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act”... Read More about California Law to Protect Minors’ Online Privacy and Purchasing Is Partially Affirmed

Bottles of Roundup herbicide displayed on a wooden surface, including a spray bottle and a concentrated liquid form.

California Blocked From Requiring Carcinogen Warning on Roundup Herbicide

The herbicide/weed killer Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate, has been banned in several countries because the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARV) found glyphosate to be “probably carcinogenic to humans.” Concurrently, under California’s Proposition 65, also known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, Roundup... Read More about California Blocked From Requiring Carcinogen Warning on Roundup Herbicide

Legal term

Search articles and Legalpedia

Subscribe to Newsletter