The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. Its Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause limits the types and severity of punishment the government may impose, including conditions of confinement and methods of execution.
The Eighth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights and provides that excessive bail shall not be required, excessive fines shall not be imposed, and cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted.
Although the amendment contains three separate protections, some of its most significant Supreme Court decisions concern the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
The Supreme Court has held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. In Robinson v. California, the Court held that states are subject to the constitutional prohibition and struck down a California law that criminalized the status of narcotics addiction.
There is no single test governing every Eighth Amendment case.
The Supreme Court has applied the clause to questions involving methods of punishment, prison conditions, proportionality, juvenile sentencing, capital punishment, and other forms of government-imposed punishment.
Historically, the prohibition was understood to forbid punishments involving torture or methods designed to inflict unnecessary cruelty. Modern Eighth Amendment doctrine also examines whether particular punishments are constitutionally excessive or whether prison officials have exposed incarcerated people to sufficiently serious risks of harm.
In death penalty cases, the Constitution does not require an execution to be completely free from any possibility of pain. The Supreme Court has instead focused on whether the method creates a constitutionally unacceptable risk of severe pain. In Baze v. Rees, the Court explained that an execution method can violate the Eighth Amendment when it presents a substantial or objectively intolerable risk of serious harm.
The Supreme Court has not interpreted the Eighth Amendment as categorically prohibiting capital punishment.
The constitutional questions instead include which crimes and defendants may constitutionally be subjected to the death penalty, whether the sentencing process satisfies constitutional requirements, and whether the chosen method of execution complies with the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
That distinction has produced a substantial body of Eighth Amendment law governing lethal injectionLethal injection is a method of carrying out a death sentence by administering one or more drugs intended to cause death. Lethal injection protocols are governed by state or federal law and can be challenged under the Eighth Amendment if the procedure allegedly creates an unconstitutional risk of severe pain.Read more → protocols and other execution methods.
The Eighth Amendment places constitutional limits on governmental punishment even after a person has been lawfully convicted.
Its protections extend beyond the length of a criminal sentence. The amendment can govern how punishment is carried out, conditions imposed while a person is incarcerated, financial penalties, bail, and the procedures used to carry out a death sentence.
Tennessee death-row prisoner Christa Gail Pike survived a failed lethal-injection execution Wednesday after state officials administered both doses of pentobarbital permitted under the execution protocol. Her survival now creates an extraordinary legal question over whether Tennessee can attempt to execute her again.The Tennessee Department of Correction says officials followed the... Read More »
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Monday to let federal prisons restrict hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery for transgender inmates, seeking to enforce the policy after two lower courts refused to clear the way.The Justice Department filed an emergency request asking the justices to lift an injunction from... Read More »
A Connecticut man serving a life sentence for murder has been awarded more than $130,000 after a federal jury found that prison officials violated his constitutional rights while he was housed at the now-closed Northern Correctional Institution.Baltas sued former state Corrections Commissioner Angel Quiros and other prison officials over conditions... Read More »
Michael Wilson, 32, was serving a two-week jail sentence in the San Diego Central Jail for violating his probation. At the time of his imprisonment, he had an enlarged heart, a serious condition that began when he was four to five months old. As a result, he needed four different... Read More »
The Harris County Jail in Houston, Texas, is facing two new lawsuits filed by renowned civil rights attorney Ben Crump. The suits, initiated late last month, address the deaths and alleged abuse of at least eight inmates and were filed on behalf of D’Alessandro Chavez-Sandoval, Alan Kerber, Eric Russell, Kyle... Read More »
Rosa Cuevas was an “uninvolved passenger” in a high-speed police chase that resulted in an injured officer and the death of a police dog. She sued the City of Tulare, California, as well as the officers and the local police chief for the injuries she suffered from three gunshot wounds... Read More »