California Assembly Advances Bill to Require Age Verification on Porn Sites

by Lawrence J. Tjan | May 23, 2024
A California Assembly member speaking about a bill for age verification on pornography websites. Photo Source: Turlock Journal

In a bipartisan effort, Republican Assembly member Juan Alanis and Democrat Rebecca Bauer-Kahan have successfully persuaded their colleagues in the California Assembly to advance legislation mandating age verification on pornography websites. The bill, Assembly Bill 3080, aims to protect children from exposure to explicit and violent sexual material online.

Juan Alanis, a former Stanislaus County sheriff’s sergeant and crimes-against-children detective, emphasized that the bill is not an attack on the adult entertainment industry but a measure to safeguard minors. "This bill is simply about protecting children – and the harmful exposure to increasingly available and increasingly violent sexual material online,” Alanis stated.

Bauer-Kahan, a prominent women’s rights advocate, highlighted alarming statistics to underscore the bill's importance. She pointed out research indicating that 40% of college-aged women have reported being choked during sexual encounters, a behavior often learned from watching porn. “It is about the safety of our children. It is about making sure that they learn healthy behaviors,” Bauer-Kahan told the Assembly.

Their arguments struck a chord with the Assembly members, as none of the 80 members voted against the bill, though 15 abstained from voting.

Under AB 3080, pornography sites would be required to take "reasonable steps" to verify that users are adults. This could involve using age verification software or asking users to provide a credit card or government-issued ID. Importantly, the bill stipulates that any data collected must ensure user anonymity and not create a record of the user’s online activity.

The bill now proceeds to the Senate, where it will face testimony from various groups, including parents' rights and church organizations, free speech advocates, and porn producers.

Joseph Kohm, director of public policy at the Colorado-based Family Policy Alliance, testified last month that children frequently visit online porn sites featuring sexual violence and verbal degradation. “They are learning about sexuality from a perspective that portrays sex as physical abuse,” Kohm told the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Free speech advocates argue that AB 3080 would infringe on the First Amendment rights of adults to access online porn. Industry representatives also warned that the age-verification requirement could significantly reduce traffic to their sites, as seen in other states with similar laws. Jiz Lee, a queer porn performer, described the measure as a "customer deterrent," adding that it would negatively impact business in California, where many subscribers are based.

Alison Boden, executive director of the Free Speech Coalition, noted that less than 1% of users complete the age-verification process in states where it is required. “What they do, according to our data, is hit the back button and find a site that doesn’t comply with the law,” Boden explained.

California joins a small group of states that have adopted age-verification requirements for porn sites, including Arkansas, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Kentucky. These states followed model legislation from the conservative Center for Renewing America. Notably, Pornhub blocked users in these states following the implementation of the new laws.

Internationally, the European Union passed its own age-verification law in December. Bauer-Kahan pointed to Europe as a model, noting that European countries have stronger privacy laws and have managed to implement age verification without compromising user privacy.

Alanis argued that the bill aligns with existing California laws that restrict children's access to adult-only products like tobacco and firearms. “California requires its own tailored approach,” he said. “We have worked to craft a workable bill using an existing statute that California has long used to protect our children from other types of harm.”

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Lawrence J. Tjan
Lawrence is an attorney with experience in corporate and general business law, complemented by a background in law practice management. His litigation expertise spans complex issues such as antitrust, bad faith, and medical malpractice. On the transactional side, Lawrence has handled buy-sell agreements, Reg D disclosures, and stock option plans, bringing a practical and informed approach to each matter. Lawrence is the founder and CEO of Law Commentary.

Related Articles

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaking about the newly signed AI safety disclosure law.
California Enacts AI Safety Disclosure Law Targeting “Frontier” Model Developers

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, on Monday, establishing new transparency and safety-reporting duties for companies developing the most powerful AI systems. Newsom’s office described the measure as “first‑in‑the‑nation” legislation aimed at balancing innovation with public safety. The law requires “frontier... Read More »

An abstract illustration depicting a person placing a red block in a puzzle on a wall, representing the complexities of identity and mental health.
California Moves to Ban Gay Conversion Therapy as a Fraudulent Business Practice

A bill aiming to limit conversion therapy (or “Sexual Orientation Change Efforts”), the practice of trying to change an individual’s sexual orientation, passed the California Assembly on April 19, 2018. Citing reports from the American Psychological Association, the American Medical Association, and various other medical organizations on the limited effectiveness... Read More »