Skip to main content
Editions

National Legal News, Information & Blogs

California Wins Court Ruling Against Trump Over National Guard Deployment

by LC Staff Writer | Sep 02, 2025
California National Guard members in tactical gear standing behind shields marked "California National." Photo Source: AP Photo/Eric Thayer via AP News

A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth violated federal law by using thousands of California National Guard members and U.S. Marines to support law enforcement in Los Angeles during immigration operations in June.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer found the deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the military from performing civilian law enforcement duties. In a 52-page opinion, he also ruled that the administration exceeded the limits of presidential authority under the Constitution by federalizing the California National Guard without proper justification.

California had argued that the deployment undermined state sovereignty and breached the 10th Amendment, which reserves certain powers to the states. Breyer agreed, noting that local agencies such as the Los Angeles Police Department and the Sheriff’s Department maintained order during the demonstrations, despite incidents of violence and property damage. He concluded there was no evidence of a “rebellion” that would allow the president to invoke emergency powers.

According to evidence presented in court, guard members and Marines supported federal immigration raids by creating perimeters, directing traffic, and securing sites. They were also present during operations at marijuana farms and accompanied federal agents during enforcement actions across Southern California. Breyer wrote that these activities were indistinguishable from policing and went beyond the protection of federal property.

The ruling grants California’s request for an injunction, preventing the Department of Defense and the Secretary of Defense from directing guard members in the state to carry out arrests, searches, or riot control unless Congress provides a valid exception. The injunction does not require the immediate withdrawal of the 300 guard members still in Los Angeles but limits their activities to roles consistent with federal law.

Breyer stayed the injunction until September 12 to allow the administration time to appeal.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

LC Staff Writer
Law Commentary’s Staff Writers are dedicated legal professionals and journalists who excel at making complex legal topics accessible and relatable. They are committed to providing clear, accurate commentary that helps readers understand the impact of legal news on their daily lives.

Related Articles

California National Guard member in riot gear holding a shield labeled “California National Guard.”
Court Rules Trump's California National Guard Takeover Was Unconstitutional

A federal appeals court ruled on October 23, 2026, that President Donald Trump violated the Constitution when he took control of approximately 4,000 California National Guard members during immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles in 2025, rejecting his administration's claim that the unrest amounted to a rebellion.In a 2-1 decision,... Read More »

A voter places a mail-in ballot into an official ballot drop box.
Appeals Court Rejects DOJ Bid to Block 20,000 California Ballots

A federal appeals court on Monday rejected the Trump administration's emergency effort to block California from counting mail-in ballots from more than 20,000 voters it suspects are noncitizens, allowing election officials to continue processing votes ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1... Read More »

Protesters sit on city steps holding signs reading “ICE OUT OF NYC” during an immigration demonstration.
Federal Judge Throws Out Trump's Bid to Overturn NYC Sanctuary Laws

A federal judge has thrown out the Trump administration's lawsuit against New York City's sanctuary laws, rejecting its attempt to force local authorities to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The October 15, 2026, ruling preserves city restrictions on assisting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).U.S. District Judge Ramón E. Reyes... Read More »

Search articles and Legalpedia

Subscribe to Newsletter