Chris Brown’s former housekeeper must choose between accepting $9.5 million or returning to trial over damages after a Los Angeles judge ruled that her $12.9 million dog attack award was excessive.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Huey P. Cotton issued the conditional new trial order on September 29, 2026, days after signaling that he planned to sharply reduce Maria Avila’s award. The ruling leaves the jury’s finding against Brown intact and limits any new trial to how much Avila should receive.
Avila won the $12.9 million verdict in June after jurors heard evidence about the injuries she suffered when Brown’s Caucasian shepherd, Hades, attacked her while she was working at his Tarzana home in December 2020.
Cotton found that the evidence supported compensation for Avila’s emotional distress, scarring and continuing pain, but concluded there was insufficient evidence of the extensive permanent nerve damage underlying part of the jury’s award.
“The court finds that the jury’s award to Maria Avila is excessive,” Cotton wrote, granting a new trial on damages unless Avila agrees to the $9.5 million figure.
The procedure, known as remittitur, allows a judge who finds a jury award excessive to offer the winning party a reduced amount instead of immediately ordering another trial. Avila can accept the lower award or reject it and ask a new jury to determine her damages.
Brown had sought a broader new trial, arguing in part that jurors were improperly influenced by learning that he had a prior felony conviction stemming from his assault on Rihanna. Cotton rejected that challenge and found that Brown received a fair trial.
A separate $885,000 award to Avila’s sister, Patricia Avila, remains intact. Patricia was also working at Brown’s property when the 2020 attack occurred.
The reduction could also affect Avila’s ongoing efforts to collect from Brown. In August, Cotton allowed qualifying tour and entertainment payments owed to the singer to be redirected toward satisfying the judgment.
Avila had already begun pursuing Brown’s earnings after winning the June verdict, including money connected to his tour with Usher. The amount subject to those collection efforts would fall substantially if she accepts the $9.5 million award.
If Avila rejects the reduction, a new jury would determine her damages without reopening Brown’s liability for the attack.