We use cookies and similar technologies to help our website function, understand how visitors use our site, and improve your experience. Some cookies are necessary for the website to operate, while others may be used for analytics or advertising.
On December 15, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied a request to rehear a decision that puts tighter restrictions on abortions in Arkansas.
The request was filed by the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights and was done so in an effort to block new restrictions on abortion that both organizations deem would be detrimental if they were to go into effect.
Four of the new restrictions at the center of the controversy include the following:
There will be a ban on abortion after 14 weeks of pregnancy.
Patient confidentiality will be eliminated because parents, partners, and other family members of the patient will be notified of an abortion that takes place.
Health care workers will now be required to report teenage abortions to local police. The state crime lab will also be legally allowed to hold the patient's medical and personal information.
Physicians will be allowed to request an array of medical records without needing medical justification for doing so. With this new medical overreach, physician-patient confidentiality will be violated, and there is the potential that access to an abortion will be delayed or blocked because of this.
Without any court intervention, these new laws could go into effect as early as December 22. As a last-minute attempt to keep the new regulations from going into effect, the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed for emergency relief on December 21.
These new restrictive laws are just four of the already 480 current abortion-related laws that limit access to abortions or put tighter restrictions on getting an abortion in the state.
The executive director of the Arkansas ACLU, Holly Dickson, says of the new restrictions, "These extreme bans and restrictions would push abortion care out of reach to many who need it and brazenly intrude on people's most personal medical decisions. While we're disappointed the Eighth Circuit declined to rehear the case, this fight is not over. The people of Arkansas have a constitutional right to control their own lives and make their own medical decisions, and we'll never stop fighting to protect it."
Ruth Harlow, the senior staff attorney for the ACLU’s Reproductive Freed project, echos the same frustration in her statement: “These Arkansas laws represent the worst motives of anti-abortion politicians: to shame, stigmatize, and humiliate abortion patients, and to make abortion care difficult if not impossible to access. While we’re disappointed with this order from the Eighth Circuit, we’re not backing down — this fight is nowhere near over. To the state of Arkansas: We’ll see you back in court.”
Abortion in Arkansas
Arkansas remains one of the most restrictive states for abortions to take place in. As of 2017, there were only four facilities that provided abortions, and three of those were clinics. As of September 2020, there has been an increase in restrictions for patients who were in need of an abortion. Some of these restrictions include the following:
Anyone under the age of 18 must have parental or guardian consent before receiving an abortion.
Public funding for an abortion is an option only in life and death cases.
Abortion clinics must undergo rigorous, unnecessary, and burdensome standards regarding the facility, equipment used, and even staffing.
Any health plans that are offered under the state's health exchange through the Affordable Care Act (ACA)The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, is a federal health care law enacted in 2010 that expanded access to health insurance, created health insurance marketplaces and premium subsidies, expanded Medicaid in participating states, and established consumer protections for people with private health coverage.Read more → can cover abortions only if the pregnancy is life-threatening or was the result of rape or incest.
Share This Article
If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.
Nadia El-Yaouti is a postgraduate from James Madison University, where she studied English and Education. Residing in Central Virginia with her husband and two young daughters, she balances her workaholic tendencies with a passion for travel, exploring the world with her family.
A federal appeals court is weighing another challenge to mifepristone, the medication used in most abortions in the United States, in a case that could affect whether patients can continue receiving the drug through telehealth and the mail.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard arguments September 9...
Read
More about Federal Appeals Court Weighs New Challenge to Abortion Pill Access by Mail »
A Missouri judge struck down a broad set of abortion restrictions, ruling that many of the state’s older abortion laws conflict with a voter-approved constitutional amendment protecting reproductive freedom.In a June 18 ruling in Jackson County Circuit Court, Judge Jerri Zhang issued a final judgment after a 10-day bench trial...
Read
More about Missouri Judge Strikes Down Major Abortion Restrictions Under Voter-Approved Amendment »
Asa Hutchinson, the governor of Arkansas, has recently signed into law a bill that will permit medical professionals to refuse to treat patients based on religious or moral objections. Critics assert that the law will give doctors sweeping abilities to turn away LGBTQ patients.
The Medical Ethics and Diversity Act,...
Read
More about Arkansas Governor Signs Law Permitting Doctors to Refuse Treatment Based on Conscience »
Texas joined South Carolina and Idaho last week in banning nearly all abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected. The law is set to be enforced in September; it now requires a physician to check for a fetal heartbeat and makes any individual who knowingly assists with an unlawful procedure...
Read
More about Texas Governor signs "heartbeat" abortion bill »
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to allow abortions to be performed in Idaho when pregnant women face medical emergencies. The decision came with a 6-3 vote, with three conservative justices dissenting.
The Supreme Court’s decision effectively reinstates a lower court ruling that Idaho's near-total abortion ban must defer...
Read
More about U.S. Supreme Court Allows Abortions for Medical Emergencies in Idaho »