Universal Music Group, Concord Music Group, and ABKCO have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, a company specializing in generative artificial intelligence. The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Tennessee, accuses Anthropic of "systematic and widespread infringement" for using copyrighted lyrics from artists like Katy Perry, The Rolling Stones, and Beyoncé to train their AI systems.
This lawsuit is particularly noteworthy as it marks the first time music publishers have taken legal action against an AI company for copyright infringement related to lyrics. It follows a similar suit by the Authors Guild against OpenAI, alleging mass-scale copyright infringement.
The complaint states that Anthropic has neither sought nor secured permission from the publishers to use their copyrighted material. This is highlighted as a double standard, as Anthropic itself would not want its proprietary code used without authorization.
The lawsuit cites Anthropic's Claude AI chatbot as evidence, which, when prompted, provided nearly identical lyrics to Katy Perry's "Roar," owned by Concord. The publishers argue that Anthropic's actions are undermining an existing market of lyric aggregators and websites that have legally licensed their works. By not licensing the content, Anthropic is not only depriving the publishers of control over their copyrighted works but also competing unfairly against those who respect copyright laws.
The publishers aim to counter any fair use defense that Anthropic might raise. They point to the recent Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith, which emphasized that the "commercial nature of the use" must be balanced against whether the work was sufficiently transformed.
It is well established by copyright law that an entity cannot reproduce, distribute, and display someone else’s copyrighted works to build its own business unless it secures permission from rightsholders.
— Matthew Oppenheim, Copyright Attorney at Oppenheim + Zebrak
The lawsuit alleges multiple types of copyright infringement: direct, vicarious, and contributory. It also includes a claim for the illegal removal of copyright management information. The publishers are seeking a court order to prevent Anthropic from using their copyrighted material and are demanding up to $150,000 in damages per infringement.
Matthew Oppenheim, a copyright attorney representing the publishers, stated that “It is well established by copyright law that an entity cannot reproduce, distribute, and display someone else’s copyrighted works to build its own business unless it secures permission from rightsholders.”
This lawsuit raises critical questions about the intersection of copyright law and artificial intelligence, setting the stage for what could be a landmark case in intellectual property law.
Share This Article
If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.
Bridget studied Communications and Marketing at California State University, Long Beach. She also has experience in the live music events industry, which has allowed her to travel to festivals around the world. During this period, she acquired valuable expertise in branding, marketing, event planning, and public relations.
Taylor Swift has taken a new legal step that reflects a growing concern across the entertainment industry: how to protect an artist’s identity in an era increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence.According to recent filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Swift’s company, TAS Rights Management, submitted three trademark...
Read
More »
Music company BMG has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, alleging that the artificial intelligence firm used copyrighted song lyrics without authorization to train its chatbot, Claude.
The complaint, filed in federal court in California, claims Anthropic incorporated lyrics from artists including Justin Bieber, Bruno Mars, Ariana Grande, and The Rolling...
Read
More »
A North Carolina man has pleaded guilty to orchestrating a large-scale fraud scheme that used artificial intelligence and automated streaming to generate millions in music royalties.
Michael Smith, 54, entered a guilty plea in federal court to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The case was heard before...
Read
More »
A New York investigative journalist has sued Grammarly, accusing the popular writing platform of using the names of writers and journalists without permission in a paid artificial intelligence feature that generated feedback as if it came from real authors and editors.
Julia Angwin filed the class action lawsuit on March...
Read
More »
Artificial intelligence company Anthropic filed two federal lawsuits Monday challenging the Trump administration’s decision to label the company a national security “supply chain risk” and cut off use of its technology across the federal government. The company argues that the action was unlawful retaliation for its refusal to remove safeguards...
Read
More »