Skip to main content
Editions

Major Music Publishers Sue Anthropic Over AI-Generated Lyrics for $75M

by Bridget Luckey | Oct 19, 2023
The Rolling Stones performing on stage during a concert. Photo Source: Jim Pietryga via Wikimedia Commons

Universal Music Group, Concord Music Group, and ABKCO have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, a company specializing in generative artificial intelligence. The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Tennessee, accuses Anthropic of "systematic and widespread infringement" for using copyrighted lyrics from artists like Katy Perry, The Rolling Stones, and Beyoncé to train their AI systems.

This lawsuit is particularly noteworthy as it marks the first time music publishers have taken legal action against an AI company for copyright infringement related to lyrics. It follows a similar suit by the Authors Guild against OpenAI, alleging mass-scale copyright infringement.

The complaint states that Anthropic has neither sought nor secured permission from the publishers to use their copyrighted material. This is highlighted as a double standard, as Anthropic itself would not want its proprietary code used without authorization.

The lawsuit cites Anthropic's Claude AI chatbot as evidence, which, when prompted, provided nearly identical lyrics to Katy Perry's "Roar," owned by Concord. The publishers argue that Anthropic's actions are undermining an existing market of lyric aggregators and websites that have legally licensed their works. By not licensing the content, Anthropic is not only depriving the publishers of control over their copyrighted works but also competing unfairly against those who respect copyright laws.

The publishers aim to counter any fair use defense that Anthropic might raise. They point to the recent Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith, which emphasized that the "commercial nature of the use" must be balanced against whether the work was sufficiently transformed.

It is well established by copyright law that an entity cannot reproduce, distribute, and display someone else’s copyrighted works to build its own business unless it secures permission from rightsholders.
— Matthew Oppenheim, Copyright Attorney at Oppenheim + Zebrak

The lawsuit alleges multiple types of copyright infringement: direct, vicarious, and contributory. It also includes a claim for the illegal removal of copyright management information. The publishers are seeking a court order to prevent Anthropic from using their copyrighted material and are demanding up to $150,000 in damages per infringement.

Matthew Oppenheim, a copyright attorney representing the publishers, stated that “It is well established by copyright law that an entity cannot reproduce, distribute, and display someone else’s copyrighted works to build its own business unless it secures permission from rightsholders.”

This lawsuit raises critical questions about the intersection of copyright law and artificial intelligence, setting the stage for what could be a landmark case in intellectual property law.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Bridget Luckey
Bridget studied Communications and Marketing at California State University, Long Beach. She also has experience in the live music events industry, which has allowed her to travel to festivals around the world. During this period, she acquired valuable expertise in branding, marketing, event planning, and public relations.

Related Articles

A hand holds a smartphone displaying The Seattle Times front page with a sketch of the Seattle skyline.
Seattle Times Sues OpenAI, Microsoft, Asks Court to Destroy AI Models

The Seattle Times and Newsday have sued OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing the companies of copying hundreds of thousands of articles without permission to train AI systems and asking a federal court to destroy models and training datasets that incorporate their journalism.The copyright infringement lawsuit, filed September 4 in the U.S.... Read More »

Person using a smartphone with floating AI icons (music note, robot, AI) to symbolize AI-generated music and labeling on streaming platforms.
AI-Generated Music Faces New Streaming Labels and Chart Restrictions

AI-generated music is facing new restrictions across streaming services and official charts as the recording industry begins setting rules for how artificial intelligence is disclosed and whether AI-made songs can compete for chart positions.Australia’s ARIA Charts began excluding wholly AI-generated tracks from its Aug. 31 ranking, while the International Federation... Read More »

Search Law Commentary

Subscribe to Newsletter