NLRB Scores Pro-Labor Win Against Amazon, Protecting Right to Group Action

by Christopher Hazlehurst | Dec 15, 2022
Stacks of Amazon packages on carts beside a delivery van. Photo Source: Adobe Stock Images

Staten Island’s regional branch of the National Labor Relations Board recently won a major victory for Amazon workers in federal court. The NLRB obtained an injunction preventing Amazon from firing employees for engaging in protected “concerted” activities, which may affect the corporate giant’s union-busting tactics across the country.

The action was brought by NLRB-29, the regional board serving Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and Long Island. The NLRB’s petition arose after Amazon fired an employee for advocating for better workplace health and safety conditions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The employee was terminated after demanding stronger safety precautions and joining his co-workers in protesting Amazon’s safety failures.

The NLRB argued that the employee had the right to join with his co-workers to make his demands and engage in protests without fear of retaliation. The court agreed and enjoined Amazon from retaliating against any more employees for engaging in protected activities, although the court did not force Amazon to reinstate the specific employee.

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) guarantees covered employees the right to engage in certain “concerted activity.” The purpose is to allow workers to join together in order to improve their wages and working conditions. Workers can band together and unionize, but even without a union, the NLRA is meant to ensure workers can engage in collective actions aimed at protecting their rights. The NLRA applies to most private sector employees, other than supervisors and employees in certain professions.

Protected concerted activity refers to when a group of workers joins together to take action for their mutual benefit or protection regarding the terms and conditions of employment. An activity is “concerted” when it involves at least two employees, although concerted action often involves many more. An activity may also be protected if taken by a single person so long as they are acting with the authority of other employees.

The NLRA protects a number of concerted activities. These activities are “protected” in that employers cannot retaliate against employees for engaging in these activities together. For example, covered employers cannot retaliate against employees for:

  • Discussing their wages and benefits with one another
  • Discussing working conditions
  • Gathering input or circulating a petition about wages or working conditions
  • Refusing, as a group, to work under unsafe conditions
  • Addressing the employer as a group, or on behalf of a group, about wages or working conditions

Employees even have the right to go to the media to discuss problems in the workplace, as well as to report working conditions to a governmental agency. Employees are not protected, however, when they make knowingly false and malicious accusations about their employer. Reporting known falsehoods to the media, for example, or picketing publicly and shouting malicious lies about the company would likely not be protected. Workers are also not protected when badmouthing a company and its products or services with no tenable connection to conditions of employment.

The injunction against Amazon comes on the heels of close to two years of protests, complaints, strikes, and other actions taken by Amazon employees fed up with unsafe working conditions during the novel coronavirus pandemic. If the corporation violates the cease-and-desist, it can be held in contempt of court. NLRB-29 Director Teresa Poor celebrated the victory, stating: “This relief is critical to ensure that Amazon employees can fully and freely exercise their rights to join together and improve their working conditions, including by forming, assisting, or joining a union.”

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Christopher Hazlehurst
Christopher Hazlehurst is a graduate of Columbia Law School, where he also served as Editor of the Columbia Law Review. Throughout his legal career, he has navigated a diverse array of intricate commercial litigation and investigations involving white-collar crime and regulatory issues. Simultaneously, he maintains a strong commitment to public interest cases nationwide. Presently, he holds a license to practice law in California.

Related Articles

Contestant from the reality show "Love Is Blind" looking concerned while surrounded by floral decorations.
NLRB Complaint Could Transform Reality TV Industry

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a groundbreaking complaint against the producers of Netflix's hit reality show Love Is Blind, arguing that contestants should be classified as employees rather than participants. The complaint alleges that contestants were misclassified, depriving them of basic labor protections under federal law. If... Read More »

A federal judge administering an oath of office to a newly appointed judge, surrounded by family and holding a book, with an official seal in the background.
Federal Judge Upholds FTC's Authority to Ban Noncompete Agreements

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Kelley Hodge upheld the authority of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to ban noncompete agreements, denying a preliminary injunction sought by ATS Tree Services. The company's request aimed to block the FTC's new rule prohibiting noncompete clauses, which is set to take effect in September.... Read More »

A warehouse worker organizes Amazon packages on a conveyor belt.
Amazon Removes Wage & Hour Class Action to Federal Court

Any lawyer will tell you that the proper venue can make or break a case. Some jurisdictions are extremely favorable to certain parties, while others can be downright hostile. California courts tend to be very protective of workers and employee rights, and they tend to be less sensitive to corporate... Read More »

SAG-AFTRA logo displayed on a building exterior.
SAG-AFTRA Prevails in Legal Battle Over COVID Safety Guidelines

As reported by The Hollywood Reporter, SAG-AFTRA has successfully defended against a series of lawsuits challenging its COVID-19 safety protocols, which included mandates for vaccination, testing, masking, and quarantining. The lawsuits, filed by various union members, were dismissed by U.S. District Judge Josephine Staton on Thursday evening. The lawsuits, numbering... Read More »