Skip to main content

Mercedes-Benz Sued Over AMG Seat Logos Allegedly Causing Burns

by Alexandra Agraz | Aug 10, 2026
Close-up of the front grille of a Mercedes-Benz vehicle, featuring the Mercedes emblem and an AMG badge.
Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

Mercedes-Benz USA is facing a proposed class action from two California drivers who claim raised metal AMG logos built into the front seats of certain vehicles become hot enough to cause burns after the cars are parked in the sun.

Gabriel Lahijani and Karendeep “Karina” Bath filed the lawsuit August 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. They allege the metallic badge is positioned where it can touch an occupant’s upper back, neck, or shoulder during ordinary use.

Lahijani, a Los Angeles resident, leased a new 2026 Mercedes-AMG E-Class from an authorized dealership, according to the complaint. He claims he entered the vehicle on May 31 while wearing a tank top and suffered a second-degree burn when his back touched the heated emblem. A board-certified dermatologist later documented first-degree and second-degree burns shaped like the AMG lettering and described the injury as “AMG inscribed.”

Bath, who lives in Chatsworth, alleges she suffered a similar injury about six weeks later. She had parked her Mercedes-AMG in Los Angeles and returned while wearing a sleeveless top. Her shoulder allegedly touched the badge as she entered the driver’s seat, causing an immediate burning sensation. The complaint states that a mark resembling the AMG logo later darkened and became more visible on her skin, consistent with a contact burn.

The drivers are seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, emotional distress and other alleged losses. They also want Mercedes-Benz to pay to remove the badges from vehicles covered by the proposed class.

The lawsuit centers on an alleged design defect, which challenges the safety of a product’s intended design rather than an error in how one item was made. California product liability law may hold a manufacturer responsible when a design creates an unreasonable risk during reasonably foreseeable use. Lahijani and Bath claim the seat emblem was defective and caused their injuries.

California design defect law generally asks whether a product was less safe than an ordinary consumer would expect or whether the risks of the design outweighed its benefits. The drivers claim Mercedes used a raised metal emblem in an area likely to touch an occupant’s skin, creating an avoidable burn risk when the seat became hot.

Mercedes-Benz USA had not filed a response to the complaint as of August 9.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz is a former Diplomatic Aide with firsthand experience in facilitating high-level international events, including the signing of critical economic and political agreements between the United States and Mexico. She holds dual associate degrees in Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, and Film, blending a diverse academic background in diplomacy, culture, and storytelling. This unique combination enables her to provide nuanced perspectives on global relations and cultural narratives.

Related Articles

Rear view of a white Toyota Sienna Hybrid minivan displayed indoors.

Toyota Loses Bid to Dismiss Class Action Over Sienna Seat Defect and Months-Long Repair Delays

Toyota must face a proposed class action after allegedly leaving families waiting months to repair defective seats in nearly 55,000 Sienna minivans, a California federal judge ruled on October 15, 2026. The lawsuit accuses the automaker of failing to provide timely repairs for a safety defect that could increase the... Read More about Toyota Loses Bid to Dismiss Class Action Over Sienna Seat Defect and Months-Long Repair Delays

Macy’s department store interior with bright lighting and shoppers browsing near the entrance.

Macy’s Faces Class Action Over WorryNoMore Furniture Protection Plan Claim Denials

Macy’s and the company that administers its WorryNoMore furniture protection plan are facing a proposed class action alleging customers were sold coverage for furniture damage and mechanical failures, then subjected to a claims process designed to steer valid requests toward exclusions.Los Angeles resident Iman Shaw sued Macy’s Inc. and Tarmo... Read More about Macy’s Faces Class Action Over WorryNoMore Furniture Protection Plan Claim Denials

Legal term

Search articles and Legalpedia

Subscribe to Newsletter