Smucker Sues Trader Joe’s Over Alleged Copycat ‘Uncrustables’ Sandwiches

by Alexandra Agraz | Oct 22, 2025
Smucker's Uncrustables peanut butter and grape jelly sandwich packaging displayed in a grocery store. Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

The J.M. Smucker Company has filed a federal lawsuit against Trader Joe’s, accusing the grocery chain of copying its popular Uncrustables sandwiches and infringing on long-held trademarks. The complaint, filed October 13 in the Northern District of Ohio, claims Trader Joe’s new crustless peanut butter and strawberry jam sandwiches imitate the distinctive round shape, crimped edges, and blue packaging of Smucker’s Uncrustables line.

Smucker argues that Trader Joe’s deliberately designed its product to resemble Uncrustables to benefit from the brand’s reputation and consumer recognition. The Ohio-based company states it has invested more than a billion dollars over two decades to build the Uncrustables brand into a household name found in millions of American homes.

According to the 25-page complaint, Smucker asserts that it holds several federally registered trademarks protecting the round crustless sandwich design, including versions showing a visible “bite” on the packaging and the stylized blue Uncrustables logo. The company alleges that consumers have already expressed confusion between the two products, citing online posts and media reports suggesting similarities in shape and presentation. Smucker further claims that Trader Joe’s packaging minimizes its own brand name and omits it from individual wrappers, increasing the likelihood of confusion.

Smucker’s lawsuit accuses Trader Joe’s of trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and deceptive trade practices under federal and state law. These claims are meant to protect brands and consumers from confusion in the marketplace. Trademark infringement refers to using a design or branding so similar to another that consumers might assume the two are related. Unfair competition and false designation of origin involve marketing that misleads buyers into believing one company’s goods are made or endorsed by another.

Trademark dilution applies when an imitation weakens the distinctiveness of a well-known brand, even when consumers are not directly confused. Together, these legal protections allow companies to defend the unique appearance, reputation, and identity of their products, ensuring fair competition across the marketplace.

Smucker is seeking a court order requiring Trader Joe’s to stop selling the product, destroy existing packaging, and pay damages for lost profits, along with legal fees and related costs. The company also requests a permanent injunction barring Trader Joe’s from using similar product designs or packaging in the future.

The case remains pending in federal court.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz
Alexandra Agraz is a former Diplomatic Aide with firsthand experience in facilitating high-level international events, including the signing of critical economic and political agreements between the United States and Mexico. She holds dual associate degrees in Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, and Film, blending a diverse academic background in diplomacy, culture, and storytelling. This unique combination enables her to provide nuanced perspectives on global relations and cultural narratives.

Related Articles

Photo of Lululemon and Costco storefronts side by side.
Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Knockoff Activewear in New Trademark Lawsuit

Lululemon is taking legal action against Costco, alleging the wholesale retailer is selling unauthorized imitations of its high-priced athletic wear under the Kirkland brand. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California, accuses Costco of infringing on Lululemon’s trademark and design rights by distributing garments that closely resemble its original... Read More »

Exterior view of a Grocery Outlet store with signage indicating it as a "bargain market."
Grocery Outlet Hit With Class Action Over Deceptive Sales Strategy

A class action lawsuit filed on June 2 in Multnomah County Circuit Court accuses Grocery Outlet and dozens of its affiliated store operators in Oregon of deceptive pricing practices that violate state consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs allege that the retailer used fabricated "elsewhere" prices to create the illusion of... Read More »

Exterior of a Costco Wholesale store displaying its signage.
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Costco Over Chocolate Dipped Ice Cream

A lawsuit which was brought against warehouse retail giant, Costco, has been dismissed by a federal judge in California. The lawsuit was brought forward by Plaintiff Ankush Puri. Puri alleged that Costco falsely advertised their Kirkland brand chocolate almond-dipped vanilla ice cream bars because the chocolate used in the ice... Read More »